The Truth

You're the board's golden child. But you know your biggest competitor spends $600B a year.

Everyone expects you to win. You have all the support in the world. The CEO loves you. The board is bullish. But privately, you see what they don't: every deal competes against “we'll just build on AWS.”

It's not your platform. It's market gravity. AWS (31%), Azure (25%), and GCP (11%) own 66% of cloud infrastructure. Hyperscaler capex will exceed $600B in 2026, with 75% going directly to AI infrastructure. The default answer is always the hyperscaler.

You can't admit this vulnerability publicly because it would shatter the image. But you know the truth: you win when you land early and expand fast. The hyperscaler always threatens to take over later.

01

Hyperscalers are the default

AWS, Azure, GCP control 66% of cloud. "We'll just build on AWS" is always on the table.

02

Land-and-expand under threat

You won the initial deal, but the hyperscaler is positioning to take over as usage scales.

03

Consumption pricing creates comparison traps

Buyers compare your per-unit costs to hyperscaler pricing, without understanding the value difference.

04

Platform lock-in fears delay decisions

Buyers are scared to commit. They don't want to get locked into another proprietary platform.

05

Technical evaluation never ends

Each department wants their own POC. Dev, Ops, Security, Compliance: everyone needs to sign off.

06

Multi-cloud strategies create complexity

Buyers want to avoid lock-in by going multi-cloud. Your platform becomes one of many, not the platform.

07

Cost optimization trumps capabilities

FinOps has entered the chat. Every platform decision is scrutinized for cost efficiency first.

08

The CTO wants differentiation, the CFO wants savings

Technical stakeholders see your value. Financial stakeholders see line items. Alignment takes months.

The Challenge

When the default is “build on the cloud provider,” you're fighting market physics.

Engineering wants to evaluate you. But the cloud architect already has AWS credits. Finance is comparing your pricing to hyperscaler consumption rates. And everyone knows migrating later is easier than committing now.

The platform decision involves everyone. DevOps, Security, Finance, Engineering, and increasingly the CIO. Each with different priorities, and each with the hyperscaler as their safe default.

These stakeholders don't see your differentiation. They see switching costs. And the switching cost of using AWS is zero because they're already there.

Then

Dev Team → POC → Expand

Land and expand worked • Own the workload

Now

Dev
Ops
Fin

POC → “Let's compare to AWS” → Hyperscaler default

$600B competitor • Default always wins

The New Reality

This is what it looks like when you're competing against market gravity.

Your platform is genuinely better for the workload. Engineering sees it. The POC proved it. But the deal still goes to “let's just use what we already have.”

The problem isn't your technology. It's that you're not selling to the right stakeholders early enough. By the time finance compares pricing, it's already over.

"We'll just build on AWS"

The default answer is always the hyperscaler. Your differentiation has to overcome a $600B/year competitor.

Land-and-expand at risk

You won the initial deal, but the hyperscaler is positioning to take over as usage scales.

Consumption pricing pressure

Your buyers compare your per-unit costs to hyperscaler pricing, without understanding the value difference.

Platform lock-in fears

Buyers are scared to commit because they don't want to get locked into another proprietary platform.

A New Solution

See who influences the platform decision. Win before the hyperscaler comparison.

New problems require new solutions. Your CRM tracks opportunities. Your sales tools find developers. But neither shows you how to win against the hyperscaler default.

You need to land earlier, with the right stakeholders, before “just use AWS” becomes the answer.

Introducing

The AI for Revenue Leaders.

Adrata uses AI to do two things: find the entire buyer group and understand each person's #1 priority. Engineering, DevOps, security, finance, the CIO, all mapped and understood.

Not titles, but influence. Find the developers who will champion you, the architects who will evaluate you, and the finance stakeholders who will compare you to hyperscaler pricing.

See the hyperscaler threat early. Know when AWS or Azure is positioning, who's pushing for the default option, and how to counter before it's too late.

Position for expansion from day one. Understand who needs to approve scaling, what usage thresholds trigger reviews, and how to secure the workload before the hyperscaler takes over.

This is Buyer Group Intelligence. Win the platform decision before the default wins.

Buyer Group Mapping

Map the platform decision makers in seconds.

Adrata automatically maps everyone who influences infrastructure decisions. Developers, architects, DevOps, security, finance: the full committee that decides where workloads run.

  • Identify architecture decision makers
  • Map hyperscaler relationships
  • Track expansion decision triggers
BG
Buyer Group: DataScale Inc6 stakeholders
JC
James Chen
Champion, Staff Engineer
SK
Sarah Kim
Influencer, Cloud Architect
MP
Mike Patel
Blocker, VP Infrastructure
LW
Lisa Wang
Budget Holder, CFO
!
Hyperscaler Alert
Mike has AWS SA relationship, pushing for SageMaker
MP
Mike PatelVP Infrastructure at DataScale
His Priorities
AWS relationshipCost predictabilityNo vendor lock-in
How to Position

Lead with multi-cloud portability. Show AWS integration, not competition. Emphasize cost transparency.

CI
Cloud Intel
AWS spend$2.4M/yr
Enterprise agreementRenews Q3
Multi-cloud interestHigh

Deep Understanding

Know each stakeholder's cloud relationship.

Go beyond job titles. Understand each stakeholder's existing cloud relationships, their vendor preferences, and what would make them choose you over the hyperscaler default.

  • Existing hyperscaler relationships
  • Current cloud spend and agreements
  • Multi-cloud strategy signals

Accelerate Deals

Win the land before the hyperscaler comparison.

Platform decisions are won or lost early. Know who's pushing for the hyperscaler default, engage the right stakeholders first, and position for expansion from day one.

  • Engage architecture decisions early
  • Counter hyperscaler positioning
  • Secure expansion path upfront
PP
Platform Playbook: DataScale
For Mike (VP Infra) - Blocker

Position as AWS complement, not replacement. Show Kubernetes portability and multi-cloud cost optimization.

For Lisa (CFO) - Budget

Lead with consumption transparency. Show how customers reduced cloud spend 40% vs hyperscaler-only.

TL
Timeline
AWS EA renewalQ3 2026
Architecture reviewThis month
Multi-cloud initiativeActive

Escape Hyperscaler Gravity.

Map the platform decision. Position against the default. Win before the hyperscaler does.

AI finds the buyer group. Your team wins the platform.